English
|
Español
Locations
Australia
Sydney
Dubai
Dubai
Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Ireland
Dublin
Latin America
Miami
New Zealand
Auckland
Portugal
Lisbon
Singapore
Singapore
Spain
Madrid
United Kingdom
Belfast
Birmingham
Cambridge
Chelmsford
London
Maidstone
Manchester
Sheffield
Taunton
Associate offices
Brazil
Chile
France
India
Pakistan
Poland
About us
Expertise
News
Knowledge
Events
Publications and articles
Case reviews
Campaigns
Civil Justice Reform
Regions
Asia Pacific
Australia
Hong Kong
New Zealand
Singapore
Europe
Ireland
Portugal
Spain
United Kingdom
Latin America
Latin America
Middle East
Dubai
People
Careers
Print
|
Email
Home
.
Knowledge
.
Publications and articles
.
Occupational disease claims - market developments
Publications and articles
Related services
Occupational disease
Contacts
Mark Burton
Sarah Stutchfield
Kieron West
Subscribe
to our publications
Occupational disease claims - market developments
Article
30 September 2011
A round up of recent news relating to the asbestos gene, Atomic Veterans Litigation, EL policy trigger litigation, noise claims and pleural plaques.
Asbestos gene
- researchers have reported in the publication, Nature Genetics, that people with gene mutation BAP1 have a higher risk of developing mesothelioma and melanoma of the eye. Individuals with the mutation have a considerably higher chance of developing mesothelioma following exposure to asbestos than those without the mutation. The researchers have suggested that their findings will help to identify individuals at high risk.
Atomic Veterans Litigation
- the Supreme Court hearing is due to commence on 14 November 2011, following the
Court of Appeal’s decision
in January 2011 that the majority of claims had not been brought within the limitation period. Between 1952 and 1958, the UK carried out a series of atmospheric tests of thermonuclear devices in the region of the Pacific Ocean. A group of 1,011 Claimants are claiming damages for the adverse consequences to health which they allege have resulted from exposure to ionising radiation deriving from the tests.
Byssinosis
- the case of Barnes v Werneth Ring Mills Ltd [2009] has recently been reported. The Claimant, who received just over £50,000, developed byssinosis after breathing in cotton dust whilst working for the Defendant between 1964 and 2002. Byssinosis is a respiratory disease caused by exposure to cotton and is very rare these days. However, this case illustrates that byssinosis claims are not extinct.
EL policy trigger litigation
- the Supreme Court appeal hearing is listed to commence on 5 December 2011. In July 2011 the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was granted permission by the Court to intervene in the appeals and make written and oral submissions. The
Court of Appeal decision
in October 2010 had serious implications for mesothelioma victims and the long tail EL market. Kennedys’ partners, Kieron West and Mark Burton are representing two of the local authorities.
Noise claims
- a refuse collector is reported to have received an out of court settlement of over £8,000 after working alongside loud bin lorries and recycling machinery without ear protection. This industry is not traditionally associated with hearing loss claims. It is not known whether the local authority obtained engineering evidence prior to settling the claim. Potential defendants and their insurers will want to monitor any further developments in this area carefully.
Pleural plaques
- the judgment of the Supreme Court relating to pleural plaques in Scotland is anticipated on 12 October 2011. Scotland has restored the right to pleural plaques compensation, subject to this ongoing challenge to the legality of the legislation brought by a group of insurers. Their appeal against the decision of the Court of Session was heard in June. The Northern Ireland Attorney General has intervened in this case.