|
|
|
Introduction
Welcome to the
first 2010 edition of Medical Law Brief. I would
like to take this opportunity to wish you a happy and
healthy New Year. In this month’s edition we focus
on Lord Justice Jackson’s recent report on
costs and the substantial and welcome
reform recommended for clinical negligence
litigation funding. For those of you with a particular
interest in costs issues, our January edition of
Liability Brief was a special edition focusing on the
publication of Lord Justice Jackson’s final report.
Read more.
The publication
of the report coincided with the arrival to our
Manchester office of two new solicitors
specialising in costs claims, Raj Patel and Saqib Khan.
In addition to the costs report this
month's issue of Medical Law Brief looks at a
number of cases in the field of Clinical Negligence,
including a claim where adequate assessment of risk and
post-procedure care are brought into question, following
the development of Grade 3-4 pressure sores, and a case
involving a fatality caused by a fracture dislocation of
the patient’s neck as a result of an ambulance crew
failing to secure a wheelchair
correctly.
We also consider a case
where negligence is claimed as a result of failure to
carry out a needle biopsy as part of a full triple
breast assessment, which has resulted in a right
mastectomy, subsequent psychological damage and reduced
life expectancy.
As usual, we also bring you the
latest news on legislation, statutes and regulation in
our field.
In relation to
other news from Kennedys I am delighted to announce that
we will be opening an office in Sheffield this
Summer. The opening of the Sheffield office
completes our national coverage and strengthens
Kennedys' core practice areas. It will provide
us with an immediate, strong and competitive footing in
Yorkshire and the North East.
Finally I would
like to inform you that our
next annual healthcare seminars will
start again on 23 February 2010 when Philip Havers QC
will discuss "causation following Bailey". If you
would like further information on this seminar please
email Kerensa Sellens, k.sellens@kennedys-law.com. As
always, if you have any comments or feedback about this
newsletter or the issues discussed in it, I would be
delighted to hear from you.
Best
wishes
Janet Sayers Head of Healthcare
Team
| |
| |
| Feature article |
Jackson Reforms - A New Dawn for Clinical
Negligence Litigation Funding?
In his recently
published report Lord Justice Jackson (LJJ) has recommended
substantial reform to the current system of clinical
negligence litigation funding to remedy the inadequate control
of public expenditure in the pursuit of these claims.
Tom Armstrong explores the impact the recently published
LJJ report on costs may have on clinical negligence claims. Read
more. | |
| Case law
|
S v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
[2009] LTLPI 8.1.2010
Claimant
was receiving treatment by peripherally inserted central
catheter into his arm in the community. He had regular visits
by district nurses and during a routine visit the line snapped
with four inches protruding from the crease at the elbow. The
nurse taped the line and arranged for an ambulance, faxing the
notes to the Defendant hospital where he arrived at around
midday. Due to other urgent admissions however attempts at
surgical removal of the line were not made until the following
morning. Attempts at removal under local anaesthetic were
unsuccessful and Claimant required hospital admission. Removal
was eventually achieved under general anaesthetic but Claimant
developed clostridium difficile during his hospital admission.
Claimant alleged negligence in delaying treatment which
allowed the line to migrate causing a need for extensive
surgery and prolonged hospital stay during which he developed
clostridium difficile. Liability disputed; Defendant submitted
the delay had occurred due to other patients requiring more
urgent treatment. The Claimant was more susceptible to
clostridium difficile as he had been taking oral antibiotics
prior to admission.
Out of court settlement: £4,000 (estimated General Damages
£3,600).
|
Gallagher v Heart of England NHS Foundation
Trust [2008] LTLPI 16.12.2009
Claimant, aged 70 years, developed Grade
3-4 pressure sores to his buttocks, sacrum and heels following
admission to Trust for manipulation and application of plaster
to both knees under general anaesthetic. His symptoms
necessitated hospital admission for 6 weeks and took a year to
fully heal.
Claimant alleged negligent failure to make
an adequate assessment of his risk of developing pressure
sores on his admission and prescribe pressure relieving
mattress and adopt a nursing system of regular repositioning
and inspection. Liability admitted.
Out of court settlement: £20,000 (estimated General Damages
£18,000).
|
Bend v Derbyshire County NHS Primary Care Trust
[2009] LTLPI 4.1.2010
Defendant
Trust ambulance crew failed to secure the Deceased’s
wheelchair correctly in their vehicle. As a consequence the
wheelchair tipped backwards causing the Deceased to suffer
fracture dislocation of his neck at C4/5. The Deceased
developed bronchopneumonia during his subsequent hospital
admission and died 18 days later. Post mortem confirmed
development of bronchopneumonia was directly linked to neck
injury. Claimant’s wife made a dependency claim. Liability
admitted.
Out of court settlement: £35,000 (estimated General Damages
£13,000).
|
S v (1) J (2) S (3) G [2009] LTLPI
9.12.2009
Claimant developed
pain, numbness, swelling and bruising in his arm following a
blood test performed by a healthcare assistant at his GP
surgery. Claimant attended A&E two days later when
haematoma was diagnosed and he was reassured and discharged
with painkillers. He attended his GP the following day due to
persisting pain and numbness from bicep to fingertips but was
again reassured. Fourteen days later symptoms persisted and
Claimant was referred to hospital where compartment syndrome
was diagnosed. It was suspected Claimant had suffered
arterial or venous puncture when blood was taken causing nerve
damage, however persisting symptoms suffered could not be
explained by any organic neurological cause and were suspected
to be psychosomatic following the original physical injury.
Claimant said he suffered a depressive disorder of moderate
severity from which he would probably recover within 12-18
months.
Breach of duty and psychiatric injury were both disputed
and claim was resolved in an out of court settlement for
£20,000 (with General Damages estimated at £7,000).
|
GB v Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
[2009] LTLPI 7.1.2010
Claimant
was referred to breast clinic at Defendant hospital by GP. She
had 5cm palpable abnormality in upper outer quadrant of right
breast close to the nipple. Mammogram and ultrasound showed
only normal and benign breast changes and she was therefore
discharged into care of GP with assurances that there were no
abnormalities.
Ten months later she again consulted her GP when it was
recorded that there was a three and a half inch mass in the
area previously examined. She was again referred to the breast
clinic but mammogram did not reveal any significant change. An
ultrasound did not reveal any mass type or focal type lesion
however, upon recommendation from the treating doctor an
ultrasound guided needle core biopsy was carried out. The
biopsy revealed that she had an invasive moderately
differentiated carcinoma measuring 120mm and five out of
thirteen lymph nodes were found to be infiltrated by
metastatic disease.
Five weeks later the Claimant underwent right mastectomy
and axillary node clearance. She subsequently had adjuvant
treatment consisting of chemotherapy and radiotherapy to the
chest wall and supraclavicular fossa, as well as adjuvant
hormonal treatment.
The Claimant brought an action against the Defendant
alleging negligence in failing to carry out needle biopsy as
part of a full triple assessment when she was initially
referred. Had the cancer been identified at that stage she
submitted she would have received a lumpectomy and avoided
mastectomy with associated physical and psychological
problems. Further, the ten month delay was likely to have an
adverse effect on survival. Liability admitted in part.
Out of court settlement: £80,000 (General damages).
Back to
top
|
| Legislation/Statute/Regulation |
|
Strengthening national commissioning:
consultation
The consultation document seeks views on proposals to:
- improve the process by which funding decisions are made
for specialised new technologies which are candidates for
national specialised commissioning
- amend the scope of the system to allow consideration of
technologies not appropriate for NICE.
The consultation process closes on 19 February.
Department of Health 14 December 2009 |
|
New professional guidelines from Law Society and
BMA to help doctors and lawyers assess capacity
The Law Society published
guidelines on 14 December 2009 to assist professionals in the
assessment of mental capacity. The guidelines set out best
practice for doctors and lawyers. They also aim to provide
practitioners with a deeper understanding of all issues
surrounding assessment of mental capacity. View
the guidelines.
Law Society 15 December 2009 |
|
Generic medicines: Consultation paper
recommending new powers for pharmacies to replace branded
drugs
The Department of Health proposes introducing generic
substitution in primary care. This will enable pharmacists and
other dispensers to fulfil a prescription for a branded
medicine by dispensing an equivalent generic medicine.
Provision will be made to allow opting out of substitution
where, in the prescriber’s clinical judgment, it is
appropriate for the patient to receive specific branded
medicine. The consultation process closes on 30 March
2010.
View
the full document.
Department of Health 5 January 2010 |
|
Changes to medicines legislation to enable
mixing prior to administration in clinical practice
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
(MHRA) has put in place changes, effective from 21 December
2009, to medicines regulations to enable mixing of medicines
prior to administration in clinical practice:
- Doctors/dentists who can already mix medicines, can
direct others to mix
- Nurse and Pharmacist Independent Prescribers to mix
themselves and direct others to do so
- Supplementary Prescribers to mix themselves and direct
others to do so, but only where that preparation forms part
of Clinical Management Plan for an individual patient
- Nurse and Pharmacist Independent Prescribers to
prescribe unlicensed medicines for their patients, on same
basis as doctors and dentists (and Supplementary Prescribers
if part of Clinical Management Plan)
The changes define mixing as “the combination of two or
more medicinal products together for the purposes of
administering them to meet needs of a particular
patient”.
Department of Health 7 January 2010
Back to
top |
| News and press
|
|
Thalidomide victims to receive £20 million
The Department of
Health will pay a grant of £20 million over three years to the
Thalidomide Trust, which helps young people disabled by the
drug. The funding will be distributed among survivors to help
meet health needs and minimise further deterioration of their
condition. The Department of Health will also look at how this
approach of working through an expert national body may be
applied to other small groups of patients with specialised
needs who are geographically dispersed.
Times 21 December 2009
Back to
top |
Kennedys
Healthcare team is based at: 25 Fenchurch Avenue, London EC3M
5AD Tel: 020 7667 9667 and Terrington House, 13-15 Hills Road,
Cambridge CB2 1NL. Tel: 01223 533 070. If you would like
further information on our Healthcare team, go to our
website. To unsubscribe from this email please
[lunsub:click here].
| | |
London 25
Fenchurch Avenue London EC3M 5AD Tel: 0207 667 9667 |
Kennedys worldwide
(including associated offices):
Auckland, Belfast,
Birmingham, Cambridge, Chelmsford, Dubai, Dublin, Hong Kong,
Karachi, Lisbon, London, Madrid, Maidstone, Manchester, Mumbai, New
Delhi, Paris, Santiago, Singapore, Sydney, Taunton and Warsaw. |
www.kennedys-law.com
Privacy
statement Disclaimer Copyright | |