Medical Law Brief
 

Introduction

Welcome to the first 2010 edition of Medical Law Brief. I would like to take this opportunity to wish you a happy and healthy New Year. In this month’s edition we focus on Lord Justice Jackson’s recent report on costs and the substantial and welcome reform recommended for clinical negligence litigation funding. For those of you with a particular interest in costs issues, our January edition of Liability Brief was a special edition focusing on the publication of Lord Justice Jackson’s final report. Read more.

The publication of the report coincided with the arrival to our Manchester office of two new solicitors specialising in costs claims, Raj Patel and Saqib Khan.

In addition to the costs report this month's issue of Medical Law Brief looks at a number of cases in the field of Clinical Negligence, including a claim where adequate assessment of risk and post-procedure care are brought into question, following the development of Grade 3-4 pressure sores, and a case involving a fatality caused by a fracture dislocation of the patient’s neck as a result of an ambulance crew failing to secure a wheelchair correctly. 

We also consider a case where negligence is claimed as a result of failure to carry out a needle biopsy as part of a full triple breast assessment, which has resulted in a right mastectomy, subsequent psychological damage and reduced life expectancy.

As usual, we also bring you the latest news on legislation, statutes and regulation in our field.

In relation to other news from Kennedys I am delighted to announce that we will be opening an office in Sheffield this Summer. The opening of the Sheffield office completes our national coverage and strengthens Kennedys' core practice areas. It will provide us with an immediate, strong and competitive footing in Yorkshire and the North East.

Finally I would like to inform you that our next annual healthcare seminars will start again on 23 February 2010 when Philip Havers QC will discuss "causation following Bailey". If you would like further information on this seminar please email Kerensa Sellens, k.sellens@kennedys-law.com. As always, if you have any comments or feedback about this newsletter or the issues discussed in it, I would be delighted to hear from you.

Best wishes 

Janet Sayers
Head of Healthcare Team

 

Key Contacts


Janet Sayers
j.sayers@kennedys-law.com


Tom Armstrong
t.armstrong@kennedys-law.com


Nico Fabri
n.fabri@kennedys-law.com


Christopher Malla
c.malla@kennedys-law.com


Mary Menjou
m.menjou@kennedys-law.com


Edited by

Tom Armstrong and Jay Surti
Feature article
Jackson Reforms - A New Dawn for Clinical Negligence Litigation Funding?

In his recently published report Lord Justice Jackson (LJJ) has recommended substantial reform to the current system of clinical negligence litigation funding to remedy the inadequate control of public expenditure in the pursuit of these claims.

Tom Armstrong explores the impact the recently published LJJ report on costs may have on clinical negligence claims. Read more.

Case law
S v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust [2009] LTLPI 8.1.2010

Claimant was receiving treatment by peripherally inserted central catheter into his arm in the community. He had regular visits by district nurses and during a routine visit the line snapped with four inches protruding from the crease at the elbow. The nurse taped the line and arranged for an ambulance, faxing the notes to the Defendant hospital where he arrived at around midday. Due to other urgent admissions however attempts at surgical removal of the line were not made until the following morning. Attempts at removal under local anaesthetic were unsuccessful and Claimant required hospital admission. Removal was eventually achieved under general anaesthetic but Claimant developed clostridium difficile during his hospital admission.

Claimant alleged negligence in delaying treatment which allowed the line to migrate causing a need for extensive surgery and prolonged hospital stay during which he developed clostridium difficile. Liability disputed; Defendant submitted the delay had occurred due to other patients requiring more urgent treatment. The Claimant was more susceptible to clostridium difficile as he had been taking oral antibiotics prior to admission.

Out of court settlement: £4,000 (estimated General Damages £3,600).

Gallagher v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2008] LTLPI 16.12.2009

Claimant, aged 70 years, developed Grade 3-4 pressure sores to his buttocks, sacrum and heels following admission to Trust for manipulation and application of plaster to both knees under general anaesthetic. His symptoms necessitated hospital admission for 6 weeks and took a year to fully heal.

Claimant alleged negligent failure to make an adequate assessment of his risk of developing pressure sores on his admission and prescribe pressure relieving mattress and adopt a nursing system of regular repositioning and inspection. Liability admitted.

Out of court settlement: £20,000 (estimated General Damages £18,000).

Bend v Derbyshire County NHS Primary Care Trust [2009] LTLPI 4.1.2010

Defendant Trust ambulance crew failed to secure the Deceased’s wheelchair correctly in their vehicle. As a consequence the wheelchair tipped backwards causing the Deceased to suffer fracture dislocation of his neck at C4/5. The Deceased developed bronchopneumonia during his subsequent hospital admission and died 18 days later. Post mortem confirmed development of bronchopneumonia was directly linked to neck injury. Claimant’s wife made a dependency claim. Liability admitted.

Out of court settlement: £35,000 (estimated General Damages £13,000).

S v (1) J (2) S (3) G [2009] LTLPI 9.12.2009

Claimant developed pain, numbness, swelling and bruising in his arm following a blood test performed by a healthcare assistant at his GP surgery. Claimant attended A&E two days later when haematoma was diagnosed and he was reassured and discharged with painkillers. He attended his GP the following day due to persisting pain and numbness from bicep to fingertips but was again reassured. Fourteen days later symptoms persisted and Claimant was referred to hospital where compartment syndrome was diagnosed.
It was suspected Claimant had suffered arterial or venous puncture when blood was taken causing nerve damage, however persisting symptoms suffered could not be explained by any organic neurological cause and were suspected to be psychosomatic following the original physical injury. Claimant said he suffered a depressive disorder of moderate severity from which he would probably recover within 12-18 months.

Breach of duty and psychiatric injury were both disputed and claim was resolved in an out of court settlement for £20,000 (with General Damages estimated at £7,000).

GB v Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2009] LTLPI 7.1.2010

Claimant was referred to breast clinic at Defendant hospital by GP. She had 5cm palpable abnormality in upper outer quadrant of right breast close to the nipple. Mammogram and ultrasound showed only normal and benign breast changes and she was therefore discharged into care of GP with assurances that there were no abnormalities.

Ten months later she again consulted her GP when it was recorded that there was a three and a half inch mass in the area previously examined. She was again referred to the breast clinic but mammogram did not reveal any significant change. An ultrasound did not reveal any mass type or focal type lesion however, upon recommendation from the treating doctor an ultrasound guided needle core biopsy was carried out. The biopsy revealed that she had an invasive moderately differentiated carcinoma measuring 120mm and five out of thirteen lymph nodes were found to be infiltrated by metastatic disease.

Five weeks later the Claimant underwent right mastectomy and axillary node clearance. She subsequently had adjuvant treatment consisting of chemotherapy and radiotherapy to the chest wall and supraclavicular fossa, as well as adjuvant hormonal treatment.

The Claimant brought an action against the Defendant alleging negligence in failing to carry out needle biopsy as part of a full triple assessment when she was initially referred. Had the cancer been identified at that stage she submitted she would have received a lumpectomy and avoided mastectomy with associated physical and psychological problems. Further, the ten month delay was likely to have an adverse effect on survival. Liability admitted in part.

Out of court settlement: £80,000 (General damages).

Back to top


Legislation/Statute/Regulation

Strengthening national commissioning: consultation

The consultation document seeks views on proposals to:

  1. improve the process by which funding decisions are made for specialised new technologies which are candidates for national specialised commissioning
  2. amend the scope of the system to allow consideration of technologies not appropriate for NICE.

The consultation process closes on 19 February.

Department of Health 14 December 2009

New professional guidelines from Law Society and BMA to help doctors and lawyers assess capacity

The Law Society published guidelines on 14 December 2009 to assist professionals in the assessment of mental capacity. The guidelines set out best practice for doctors and lawyers. They also aim to provide practitioners with a deeper understanding of all issues surrounding assessment of mental capacity.
View the guidelines.

Law Society 15 December 2009

Generic medicines: Consultation paper recommending new powers for pharmacies to replace branded drugs

The Department of Health proposes introducing generic substitution in primary care. This will enable pharmacists and other dispensers to fulfil a prescription for a branded medicine by dispensing an equivalent generic medicine. Provision will be made to allow opting out of substitution where, in the prescriber’s clinical judgment, it is appropriate for the patient to receive specific branded medicine. The consultation process closes on 30 March 2010.

View the full document.

Department of Health 5 January 2010

Changes to medicines legislation to enable mixing prior to administration in clinical practice

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has put in place changes, effective from 21 December 2009, to medicines regulations to enable mixing of medicines prior to administration in clinical practice:

  • Doctors/dentists who can already mix medicines, can direct others to mix
  • Nurse and Pharmacist Independent Prescribers to mix themselves and direct others to do so
  • Supplementary Prescribers to mix themselves and direct others to do so, but only where that preparation forms part of Clinical Management Plan for an individual patient
  • Nurse and Pharmacist Independent Prescribers to prescribe unlicensed medicines for their patients, on same basis as doctors and dentists (and Supplementary Prescribers if part of Clinical Management Plan)

The changes define mixing as “the combination of two or more medicinal products together for the purposes of administering them to meet needs of a particular patient”.

Department of Health 7 January 2010

Back to top

News and press

Thalidomide victims to receive £20 million

The Department of Health will pay a grant of £20 million over three years to the Thalidomide Trust, which helps young people disabled by the drug. The funding will be distributed among survivors to help meet health needs and minimise further deterioration of their condition. The Department of Health will also look at how this approach of working through an expert national body may be applied to other small groups of patients with specialised needs who are geographically dispersed.

Times 21 December 2009

Back to top


Kennedys Healthcare team is based at: 25 Fenchurch Avenue, London EC3M 5AD Tel: 020 7667 9667 and Terrington House, 13-15 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1NL. Tel: 01223 533 070.
If you would like further information on our Healthcare team, go to our website.
To unsubscribe from this email please [lunsub:click here].
London
25 Fenchurch Avenue
London
EC3M 5AD
Tel: 0207 667 9667
Kennedys worldwide (including associated offices):

Auckland, Belfast, Birmingham, Cambridge, Chelmsford, Dubai, Dublin, Hong Kong, Karachi, Lisbon, London, Madrid, Maidstone, Manchester, Mumbai, New Delhi, Paris, Santiago, Singapore, Sydney, Taunton and Warsaw.
www.kennedys-law.com

Privacy statement
Disclaimer
Copyright